Bias in the processing of crime data: A comparison of police and social scientist constructs of the drug/homicide nexus.

Item

Title
Bias in the processing of crime data: A comparison of police and social scientist constructs of the drug/homicide nexus.
Identifier
AAI9108170
identifier
9108170
Creator
Ryan, Patrick Joseph.
Contributor
Adviser: Antony E. Simpson
Date
1990
Language
English
Publisher
City University of New York.
Subject
Sociology, Criminology and Penology | Sociology, Theory and Methods | Information Science
Abstract
The dissertation addresses the question: Are the police a valid source for criminologically useful data? It compares two sets of data describing the identical sample of criminal homicides in New York City, 1988. The findings demonstrate that research data collected by an agency whose raison d'etre is not scientific inquiry and data collected by social scientists, will produce quite dissimilar constructs of "what happened" regards the crime studied.;The sociology of knowledge provides a theoretical basis upon which to posit that a tension between the tacit knowledge of persons in different fields will naturally and irreversibly lead to disagreement in how each interpret, first, the phenomenon observed and then, the verbiage used to systematically record it.;Recommendation is made that researchers who rely on public agencies for research data limit the idiom of their operational definitions to those most easily comprehended by the practitioner. The study also strongly suggests that if crime data is to be meaningful for the purposes of social scientists, collection methods should always include a follow-up interview in which mutual understanding of events and the variables used to record them can be elaborated and clarified.
Type
dissertation
Source
PQT Legacy CUNY.xlsx
degree
Ph.D.
Item sets
CUNY Legacy ETDs